Key phrases: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Resilient Community Construction Set | *Resilient Community Construction Set | ||
*the "unleashed" ability to make things | *the "unleashed" ability to make things | ||
*As James Howard Kunstler once said after visiting the Googleplex: "The changes we need are not like pushing pixels around the screen." (I am paraphrasing...source: here - highly recommended audio ). | |||
=Transhumanist Audience= | |||
I think your message of independence will resonate extremely well with them. They are revoluzzis who would like nothing more than to change power structures and topple hierarchies. Focus on that and you'll win big time. I would also emphasize your important argument of high-tech neo-subsistence. These people are tech fanatics. Let's face it: all too often we don't need very sophisticated technology. Old-school, proven solutions exist, we just need to redicover them. You know that better than I do. But that's not what they want to hear. They like high tech solutions because they have the potential to revolutionize and cause damage to existing power structures. The way to reconcile this is that you could focus on design. We rediscover and refine some old stuff (f.ex. steam engine... ). But we add a 21st century cutting edge design. That is how the environmental movement in general is succeeding in distancing itself from the jute-bag, birkenstock wearing hippy image. Emphasize art ! This will also fly. You will make many new true fans. | |||
[[Category:Marketing]] | [[Category:Marketing]] | ||
Revision as of 19:23, 20 November 2009
last updated 11.18.09
- evolve to freedom
- innovation = invention + diffusion
- post-scarcity
- opensourcing the wheel, not reinventing the wheel
- Open Source Fab Lab = RepLab
- technology has a human interface usable by a person with a high school education
- "to further the establishment and growth of novel, autonomous communities, enabling innovation with new social and industrial systems."
- Decent technology (decentralization technology)
- Resilient Community Construction Set
- the "unleashed" ability to make things
- As James Howard Kunstler once said after visiting the Googleplex: "The changes we need are not like pushing pixels around the screen." (I am paraphrasing...source: here - highly recommended audio ).
Transhumanist Audience
I think your message of independence will resonate extremely well with them. They are revoluzzis who would like nothing more than to change power structures and topple hierarchies. Focus on that and you'll win big time. I would also emphasize your important argument of high-tech neo-subsistence. These people are tech fanatics. Let's face it: all too often we don't need very sophisticated technology. Old-school, proven solutions exist, we just need to redicover them. You know that better than I do. But that's not what they want to hear. They like high tech solutions because they have the potential to revolutionize and cause damage to existing power structures. The way to reconcile this is that you could focus on design. We rediscover and refine some old stuff (f.ex. steam engine... ). But we add a 21st century cutting edge design. That is how the environmental movement in general is succeeding in distancing itself from the jute-bag, birkenstock wearing hippy image. Emphasize art ! This will also fly. You will make many new true fans.