Solar Concentrators: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
We are proposing linear collectors of this type: | We are proposing linear collectors of this type: | ||
[[Image:fresnel_collector.jpg]] | [[Image:fresnel_collector.jpg]] from [http://www.redrok.com/images/hdsolar.jpg] | ||
And basic cost figures are: | And basic cost figures are: | ||
Revision as of 03:52, 27 January 2008
Feasibility Study
We must go through a basic feasibility study to understand the importance and potential of solar concentrator power. First, we are considering solar concentrators for solar electric power. While there are many solar electric system options available, from photovoltaics and stirling engines to Rankine cycle low temperature electrical generators, we believe that the boundary layer turbine with solar concentrators is the lowest cost, most ecological, and simplest to manufacture.
Consider these basic facts relevant to power:
- Solar insolation on a clear day is about 1 kW/square meter
- Considering cloud cover and day/night cycles, a place like Missouri gets 6 kWhr/square meter/day of insolation throughout the year, on average. [1]. You can check the insolation for your location in the uSA as well.
- The earth intercepts 10,000 more times energy from the sun than we currently use in all fossil and nonfossil fuels today.
- The energy intercepted per acre of land is 4 megawatts.
- If overall energy conversion efficiency for that land area were 5%, then you would produce 200kW of power from that acre of insolation.
- The boundary layer turbine is proven to be at least 25% efficient for unoptimized experiments in the literature. [2]
- Counting overall system efficiency, 10% efficiency is easily attained
- If only half the land area is solar collectors (rest is access, etc.), then 5% is a reasonable figure
- The 200 kW obtainable per acre is still better, even on a per-acre basis, than coal power plants.
We are proposing linear collectors of this type:
from [3]
And basic cost figures are:
- Cost of mirrors is about $1/sq ft
- The heart of a solar collector stirlin
Tamera has hot oil system in place - http://www.solarpowervillage.info/
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Top_100_Technologies_--_RD#Top_100 says:
Stirling Energy Systems utility solar - 20-year purchase agreement between Southern California Edison and Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. will result in 20,000+ dish array covering 4,500 acres capable of generating 500 MW, at a cost competitive to grid power. 37 foot diameter dishes. Each dish yields 25 kW. Nice. pi*18^2= 1074 sq feet, or exactly 100 square meters. 25% overall efficiency for the most advanced Stirling engine.
This is 100 kW/acre. Our calculations indicate 4 mW/acre, at 5%, 200 kW/acre. 50% fill factor, 100 kW/acre.