Nmap:3D Printer/Selling::Purchasing Criteria: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
# https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
# https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
# Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
# Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
# Will it set my house on fire?
# Will it set my house on fire (* Prusa has a better track record than clones)
* Prusa has a better track record than clones
# Upgradability
# Upgradability
# Robustness of parts
# Robustness of parts

Revision as of 21:38, 22 October 2018

Dentist Guy Feedback

I've mainly been looking at the following:

  1. https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
  2. Support; the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
  3. Will it set my house on fire (* Prusa has a better track record than clones)
  4. Upgradability
  5. Robustness of parts

Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.

Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.