User talk:Conor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Marie.Byleen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
How can the power cube be brought into the current category structure? It is used with so many other applications that is seems difficult to categorize, but it does need to be included. [[User:Marie.Byleen|Marie.Byleen]] 12:43, 26 February 2011 (PST) | How can the power cube be brought into the current category structure? It is used with so many other applications that is seems difficult to categorize, but it does need to be included. [[User:Marie.Byleen|Marie.Byleen]] 12:43, 26 February 2011 (PST) | ||
:Energy, I'd say. Thanks for your efforts getting it formatted. --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 13:20, 26 February 2011 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 21:20, 26 February 2011
Do you see...
The orange box that says new message? Sorry I bulldozed your code, I noticed the change but figured you were still playing with it. Anyways, The wikitable format is way simpler for accomplishing basic table tasks. I sent you an email just a moment ago too. --C 14:57, 18 February 2011 (PST)
- Yeah, the wikitable is neater; my way was just a hack. --Conor 14:59, 18 February 2011 (PST)
- Oh and convention for wiki conversations is to add another colon before each new reply until it gets about
- here
- then you reset and continue the process, and adding a new topic resets it as well. It prevents wall of text formations.--C 15:03, 18 February 2011 (PST)
- Oh and convention for wiki conversations is to add another colon before each new reply until it gets about
Power Cube
How can the power cube be brought into the current category structure? It is used with so many other applications that is seems difficult to categorize, but it does need to be included. Marie.Byleen 12:43, 26 February 2011 (PST)
- Energy, I'd say. Thanks for your efforts getting it formatted. --Conor 13:20, 26 February 2011 (PST)