Cory Shenk's Log: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==June 5, 2013==
==June 5, 2013==
==Truck: Rear==
[[File:Truck rear1.PNG|thumb|300px|June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear with dimensions]]
[[File:Truck rear2.PNG|thumb|300px|June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear Front View]]
[[File:Truck rear axle.PNG|thumb|300px|June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear Axle]]
-Constructed the axle with 4" square tubing.
-Made the truck bed wider, slightly over 4' to allow loading of standard size plywood.
-Added 2" square tubing for rigidity in sides.  Hopefully they are available, or another solution will be needed.
-Still have to design wheel hubs.  Bent rebar would be fast, but not modular.  I am thinking that I will stack two 4" tubes on top of each other which will allow clearance and then lay flat metal across.  This area is not load bearing.  There could be a solution far lighter and cheaper not using metal. 
[[File:Shenk truck back.skp]]
==MicroTrac: Tracks==


[[File:MT tracks proper.PNG|thumb|300px|June 5, 2013 MicroTrac track component]]
[[File:MT tracks proper.PNG|thumb|300px|June 5, 2013 MicroTrac track component]]

Revision as of 23:26, 5 June 2013

June 5, 2013

Truck: Rear

June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear with dimensions
June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear Front View
June 5, 2013 Truck: Rear Axle

-Constructed the axle with 4" square tubing. -Made the truck bed wider, slightly over 4' to allow loading of standard size plywood. -Added 2" square tubing for rigidity in sides. Hopefully they are available, or another solution will be needed. -Still have to design wheel hubs. Bent rebar would be fast, but not modular. I am thinking that I will stack two 4" tubes on top of each other which will allow clearance and then lay flat metal across. This area is not load bearing. There could be a solution far lighter and cheaper not using metal.

File:Shenk truck back.skp



MicroTrac: Tracks

June 5, 2013 MicroTrac track component

The tracks that I had been working on were scaled down from the tracks off of the LifeTrac which was incorrect. Here I have drawn the component with the correct sizes for the track that will fit to the MicroTrac. I was unable to figure out how to include the dimensions for the holes; they are all 3/8" in diameter. The rebar pieces are all #2 (1/4").

I tested the rotation and it appears that even if the track components were both to rotate at a 45 degree angle they will still not interfere with each other. In the case of the tracks, they should never rotate that far.

The attachment/adjustment component should still work with this design. It will have to be redrawn to fit this new model.

While thinking about the adjusting and attaching I have wondered if it would be a good idea to have two or four points for adjustment similar to snow chains on large trucks.

File:MT tracks proper.skp


June 4, 2013

File:Micro fulltrack6 3.skp

Completed tracks for MicroTrac with proposed attachment/adjustment component.


Changes

June 4, 2013 MicroTrac track

Modified track with completed track component and proposed attachment/adjustment component. File:Micro fulltrack6 4.skp