Solar Concentrators: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
We must go through a basic feasibility study to understand the importance and potential of solar concentrator power. First, we are considering solar concentrators for solar electric power. While there are many solar electric system options available, from photovoltaics and stirling engines to Rankine cycle low temperature electrical generators, we believe that the [http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?title=Boundary_Layer_Turbine boundary layer turbine] with solar concentrators is the lowest cost, most ecological, and simplest to manufacture.  
We must go through a basic feasibility study to understand the importance and potential of solar concentrator power. First, we are considering solar concentrators for solar electric power. While there are many solar electric system options available, from photovoltaics and stirling engines to Rankine cycle low temperature electrical generators, we believe that the [http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?title=Boundary_Layer_Turbine boundary layer turbine] with solar concentrators is the lowest cost, most ecological, and simplest to manufacture.  


==Power==
Consider these basic facts relevant to power:
Consider these basic facts relevant to power:


Line 18: Line 19:


[[Image:fresnel_collector.jpg]] from [http://www.redrok.com/images/hdsolar.jpg]
[[Image:fresnel_collector.jpg]] from [http://www.redrok.com/images/hdsolar.jpg]
==Cost==


And basic cost figures are:
And basic cost figures are:
Line 27: Line 30:
*Costs for solar cells that are presently available are $40/sq ft, or a factor 8 more
*Costs for solar cells that are presently available are $40/sq ft, or a factor 8 more
*The boundary layer turbine [http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?title=Boundary_Layer_Turbine] cost is negligible compared to the collector cost - $300 for the model that we are developing
*The boundary layer turbine [http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?title=Boundary_Layer_Turbine] cost is negligible compared to the collector cost - $300 for the model that we are developing
**5 kW turbine, with off-shelf generator head - is $600 total, plus $400 in labor = $1000 neocommercialization [] cost  
**5 kW turbine, with off-shelf generator head - is $600 total, plus $400 in labor = $1000 neocommercialization [http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Neocommercialization] cost  
Tamera has hot oil system in place - http://www.solarpowervillage.info/
Tamera has hot oil system in place - http://www.solarpowervillage.info/


http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Top_100_Technologies_http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Neocommercialization--_RD#Top_100 says:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Top_100_Technologies_--_RD#Top_100 says:


Stirling Energy Systems utility solar - 20-year purchase agreement between Southern California Edison and Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. will result in 20,000+ dish array covering 4,500 acres capable of generating 500 MW, at a cost competitive to grid power. 37 foot diameter dishes. Each dish yields  25 kW. Nice. pi*18^2= 1074 sq feet, or exactly 100 square meters. 25% overall efficiency for the most advanced Stirling engine.
Stirling Energy Systems utility solar - 20-year purchase agreement between Southern California Edison and Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. will result in 20,000+ dish array covering 4,500 acres capable of generating 500 MW, at a cost competitive to grid power. 37 foot diameter dishes. Each dish yields  25 kW. Nice. pi*18^2= 1074 sq feet, or exactly 100 square meters. 25% overall efficiency for the most advanced Stirling engine.


This is 100 kW/acre. Our calculations indicate 4 mW/acre, at 5%, 200 kW/acre. 50% fill factor, 100 kW/acre.
This is 100 kW/acre. Our calculations indicate 4 mW/acre, at 5%, 200 kW/acre. 50% fill factor, 100 kW/acre.

Revision as of 04:04, 27 January 2008

Feasibility Study

We must go through a basic feasibility study to understand the importance and potential of solar concentrator power. First, we are considering solar concentrators for solar electric power. While there are many solar electric system options available, from photovoltaics and stirling engines to Rankine cycle low temperature electrical generators, we believe that the boundary layer turbine with solar concentrators is the lowest cost, most ecological, and simplest to manufacture.

Power

Consider these basic facts relevant to power:

  • Solar insolation on a clear day is about 1 kW/square meter
    • Considering cloud cover and day/night cycles, a place like Missouri gets 6 kWhr/square meter/day of insolation throughout the year, on average. [1]. You can check the insolation for your location in the uSA as well.
  • The earth intercepts 10,000 more times energy from the sun than we currently use in all fossil and nonfossil fuels today.
  • The energy intercepted per acre of land is 4 megawatts.
  • If overall energy conversion efficiency for that land area were 5%, then you would produce 200kW of power from that acre of insolation.
    • The boundary layer turbine is proven to be at least 25% efficient for unoptimized experiments in the literature. [2]
    • Counting overall system efficiency, 10% efficiency is easily attained
    • If only half the land area is solar collectors (rest is access, etc.), then 5% is a reasonable figure
  • The 200 kW obtainable per acre is still better, even on a per-acre basis, than coal power plants.

We are proposing linear collectors of this type:

Fresnel collector.jpg from [3]

Cost

And basic cost figures are:

  • Cost of mirrors for such a collector is about $1/sq ft
    • The heart of a solar collector is mirrors
  • Balance of system costs for the collector incude structure and collector tube assembly
    • Balance of system costs should be about $5/sq ft
  • Costs for solar cells that are presently available are $40/sq ft, or a factor 8 more
  • The boundary layer turbine [4] cost is negligible compared to the collector cost - $300 for the model that we are developing
    • 5 kW turbine, with off-shelf generator head - is $600 total, plus $400 in labor = $1000 neocommercialization [5] cost

Tamera has hot oil system in place - http://www.solarpowervillage.info/

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Top_100_Technologies_--_RD#Top_100 says:

Stirling Energy Systems utility solar - 20-year purchase agreement between Southern California Edison and Stirling Energy Systems, Inc. will result in 20,000+ dish array covering 4,500 acres capable of generating 500 MW, at a cost competitive to grid power. 37 foot diameter dishes. Each dish yields 25 kW. Nice. pi*18^2= 1074 sq feet, or exactly 100 square meters. 25% overall efficiency for the most advanced Stirling engine.

This is 100 kW/acre. Our calculations indicate 4 mW/acre, at 5%, 200 kW/acre. 50% fill factor, 100 kW/acre.