D3D Fusion printer design: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Requirements) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
= Requirements = | = Requirements = | ||
#Buildable during 1 day workshop, even for inexperienced builders. | #Buildable during 1 day workshop, even for inexperienced builders. | ||
#[[OSE | #[[OSE Label]] documented. | ||
#Automatic bed leveling mechanism | #Automatic bed leveling mechanism | ||
#[http://www.oshwa.org/2015/09/19/open-source-hardware-certification-version-1/ OSHWA certification] compliant | #[http://www.oshwa.org/2015/09/19/open-source-hardware-certification-version-1/ OSHWA certification] compliant |
Revision as of 15:22, 31 December 2015
Tech Tree of Choices
Requirements
- Buildable during 1 day workshop, even for inexperienced builders.
- OSE Label documented.
- Automatic bed leveling mechanism
- OSHWA certification compliant
- $500 in parts for single print head version
- Wirelessly controllable
- Capable of storing and independently running wirelessly uploaded gcode
- Ninjaflex print capable
- Single print head version easily extendable to accommodate quadruple parallel printing
- Capable of hours of maintenance free printing between any required fix
- Build techniques must be easily scalable up to meter scale 3D printers
- Addable clear enclosure
- Modular tool head attachment
- Functions as an effective Repstrap
- XY-fixed build platform
- Heated build platform that can be retrofitted readily without compromising bed leveling mechanism.
- Capable of bumping (strong and tall) prints off of build platform without human assistance
- Works with open source filament from open source filament extruder
- Functional Logic and design rationale is fully documented
- Capable of printing currently mass produced conductive filaments
Goals
- Fits Extreme Manufacturing model. This means optimizing for a parallel build process. See Extreme Manufacturing for more.
- Distribution of the machine through distributive enterprise propagation.
- Design being built upon, resulting in design remixes/derivatives.
- Distribution of derivatives through distributive enterprise propagation.
- Distributed Market Domination via derivatives.
Future Work
- Respects Your Freedom certified
- Works with irregular dimension filament
- Coherence with other machines to achieve Productive Recursion of a complete workshop tool chain
- Capable of sensing different abort situations
- Detached print
- Failing material feed
- Improper temperature of print
- Failing positioning system (skipped stepper motor steps or similar)
- Capable of automatically pausing abort situations 1 and 2 and presenting manual mitigation instructions and resume options
- Capable of automatically mitigating abort situations 3 and 4
- Addable syringe head for conductive ink printing
Link Matrix
Source code: | Github repo | |
Licences: | Repo: GPLv3, All wiki information: CC-BY | Follows FSF's recommendations |
Part of: | D3D Fusion |
Design Brainstorm
Making it modular
Much like Alexander Stepanenko has done for CNCs here:
This would allow extending to a multi purpose machine at a later stage. Examples of existing multi purpose machines are Diyouware[1] and Fabtotum Fabricator[2].
CoreXZ
This means driving the X/Z directions by rotating two motors in same/opposite directions. The idea has been tested with good results[3].
The big win with this configuration is saving one motor (compare to current common designs that uses 2 motors for Z axis) and much easier build (thread and bearings replace threaded rod with nut).
CoreXYZ
There's nothing hindering us from also driving a Y axis with lines, like shown here:
Again, saving in a Y-axis belt and motor makes it an easier build. Using v-groove bearings and dynema line for driving all axes also takes down the unique part count really low.
Inspiration
- Prusa i3 Steel
- Ultimaker
- DIY CNC machines - specify more here...
- Linear actuators built as stand alone modules
- Modular Desktop CNC
Everything below here is being rewritten and filled into the D3D Tech Tree of Choices slide show
Linear motion
A 3-axis Cartesian 3D printer needs to control linear movement very precisely. To keep firmware simple and computational load low, open loop arrangements (no sensor feedback regarding motion) are preferred for simple printers. This could for example be achieved by putting electromagnets on a row and placing a ferromagnet above it. Sequentially activating the electromagnets would make the ferromagnet move along a straight line in a controlled way.
Pros of this solution:
- Easy to understand - Open loop control, no feedback or feedback processing needed
Cons:
- Needs many electromagnets and wires (doesn't scale) - Off the shelf driver soulutions not available - A range of possible speed/force-ratios are built into the machine - Steps are discrete, so precision is limited
All small 3d printer designs overcomes the cons by having the electromagnets arranged in a circle, and the ferromagnets attached to a shaft right in the middle of it. This gives the advantages
- Scaling problem solved. Can do infinitely many rotations with fix number of magnets.
... but adds the disadvantage
- Outputs rotational motion that needs to be converted into linear motion
Converting the rotation into a linear motion could be done in a number of ways:
- Rotating a pulley that drive a belt/wire
- Rotating a threaded shaft
- Rotating a gear that "walks" a toothed strip
See Polhems mechanical alphabet for suggestions...
Pulley and Belt or Wire
The usual way to drive the axes of a 3d printer is by belts (GT2) or by some kind of non-flexible line/wire. The pros of belts/wires:
- Cheap - Well known/widely used - Easy to source - You can change gear ratio by changing pulley, keeping the belt itself
Cons of belts/wires:
- Must be cut to length - Must be fastened somehow - Must be tightened somehow - Needs retightening after some time - Needs guides and bearings to run smooth and stay in place
Threaded shafts
A common way to build a linear actuator is to use a threaded shaft and a nut/bearing for translating rotational motion into linear motion. The choice of threaded shaft type is a compromise between price and performance.
Construction type
Cheap common studs designed to be used in tension, keeping things in place. They're not designed to be very straight or to be very wear resistant. When supported by additional smooth rods or extrusions, they're good enough for light and slow linear actuators. Most RepRap designs use them in their Z axis actuator.
Leadscrew
Designed to translate turning motion into linear motion. About twice the price of construction type studs.
Available already mounted as stepper motor shafts: [4][5]
Ball Screw
A helical raceway for specialized ball bearings. Less friction than leadscrew. About twice the price of leadscrew.
Roller Screw
High precision screw type that use planetary type bearings. Performance is usually very good, but price is an order of magnitude higher than that of ball screws[6].
D3D Printer Design Choice
The D3D Printer will have a Cartesian coordinate system driven by four linear actuators. For modularity and ease of build we want the linear actuators for the different axes to be as similar to each other as possible without sacrificing print speed or accuracy.
The leadscrew type of threaded shafts will be tested first. Since they are sold as mounted stepper motor shafts, they can potentially eliminate the need for a coupling between motor and shafts. Couplings are usual sources for misalignments, so getting away from them is a big relief.
The pros of ready-mounted threaded shafts:
- Easy and fail safe mounting
- High and predictable precision over time
- No maintenance
- Needs less guide/support parts than belts
The cons of ready-mounted threaded shafts:
- Harder to source
- More expensive
- Fixed pitch
Price examples
Pitch/torque Examples
- 3 tpi, 8 mm. 10 RPS = 600 RPM. Typical curve. - [7]
- RepRap Lisa Simpson - [8]
- Using these motors - [9] - torque curves are - []
- About stepper motor curves - [10]
Linear guides
Use linear bearings with flanges for easier mounting: [11]
Positioning in 3D space
Feeding plastic
Pellets
Filament
Direct extrusion Used by most early RepRaps. Drawback is that Extruder motor is heavy (do we don't want to move it along with hot end). Some effort has been put into combining direct extrusion with fixed E-motor and a sliding hobbed bolt[12]. There's also the Flexible Drive Shaft Extruder[13] which has been reported to work well.
Bowden extrusion
This is the most common way to extrude filament. Extruder motor is fixed and filament is pushed from extruder motor to hot end through a PTFE tube. Introduces more delay and tension complications than either of the direct extrusion solutions.