Nmap:3D Printer/Selling::Purchasing Criteria: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Dentist Guy Feedback == I've mainly been looking at the following: 1: https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html 2. Support; the prusa are...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Dentist Guy Feedback ==
== Dentist Guy Feedback ==
I've mainly been looking at the following:
I've mainly been looking at the following:
1: https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
# https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
2. Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
# Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
3. Will it set my house on fire?
# Will it set my house on fire?
              Prusa has a better track record than clones
** Prusa has a better track record than clones
4. Upgradability
## Upgradability
5. Robustness of parts
## Robustness of parts


Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.
Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.


Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.
Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.

Revision as of 21:38, 22 October 2018

Dentist Guy Feedback

I've mainly been looking at the following:

  1. https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
  2. Support; the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
  3. Will it set my house on fire?
    • Prusa has a better track record than clones
    1. Upgradability
    2. Robustness of parts

Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.

Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.