Nmap:3D Printer/Selling::Purchasing Criteria: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
# Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
# Support;  the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
# Will it set my house on fire?
# Will it set my house on fire?
** Prusa has a better track record than clones
* Prusa has a better track record than clones
## Upgradability
# Upgradability
## Robustness of parts
# Robustness of parts


Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.
Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.


Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.
Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.

Revision as of 21:38, 22 October 2018

Dentist Guy Feedback

I've mainly been looking at the following:

  1. https://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/180-original-prusa-i3-mk3-kit.html
  2. Support; the prusa are much better supported than all the monoprice, Anet A8, etc clones
  3. Will it set my house on fire?
  • Prusa has a better track record than clones
  1. Upgradability
  2. Robustness of parts

Ironically, print quality is my lowest criteria.

Your demo on a rickety folding table was extremely impressive.