Mathematics of Classical Mechanics: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The mechanics of rigid bodies which I learned in engineering classes was mostly: * Draw a system. * Draw a lot of forces and constraints. * Select a coordinate system. Mostly...")
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


But maybe there is a more elegant way to do it? I hope to use a more mathematical approach, like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_mechanics  Langrangian] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton%27s_principle Hamiltonian] mechanics.
But maybe there is a more elegant way to do it? I hope to use a more mathematical approach, like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_mechanics  Langrangian] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton%27s_principle Hamiltonian] mechanics.
== Books ==
I will use a couple of books.
* [[https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/sicm_edition_2/book.html Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics]].
* PRO: Is it is publicly available
* PRO: It use programming for demonstration and experinats.
* PRO: The authors care about didactitics.
* CON: They use an old version of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29 Scheme] which you need to install first.

Revision as of 09:01, 4 November 2018

The mechanics of rigid bodies which I learned in engineering classes was mostly:

  • Draw a system.
  • Draw a lot of forces and constraints.
  • Select a coordinate system. Mostly XYZ.
  • Calculate. When something strange happen, check your forces again.

Using this approach for moving parts was pretty annoying.

But maybe there is a more elegant way to do it? I hope to use a more mathematical approach, like Langrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

Books

I will use a couple of books.

* PRO: Is it is publicly available
* PRO: It use programming for demonstration and experinats.
* PRO: The authors care about didactitics.
* CON: They use an old version of Scheme which you need to install first.