Mathematics of Classical Mechanics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→Books) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* PRO: It use programming for demonstration and experinats. | * PRO: It use programming for demonstration and experinats. | ||
* PRO: The authors care about didactitics. | * PRO: The authors care about didactitics. | ||
* PRO: Operator notation. D_1(f) instead of df/dx (I need mathematical notation here) | |||
* CON: They use an old version of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29 Scheme] which you need to install first. | * CON: They use an old version of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29 Scheme] which you need to install first. | ||
* Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics Second Edition, V.I. Arnold. I prefer the Russian Version. There are are also translations to German and English | |||
* PRO: More mathematical formalism. | |||
* CON: I feel that I miss some mathematics and physics knowledge to understand it. | |||
* Курс теоретической физики Ландау и Лифшица (Course of Theoretical Physics from L. Landau and E. Lifshitz), Volume 1, Mechanics. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_of_Theoretical_Physics] | |||
* PRO: More physics. | |||
* PRO: Good quality, as a classical teaching book in Soviet Union. | |||
* CON: Too sloppy mathematical formalism for me. Too view intermediate steps. |
Revision as of 10:46, 4 November 2018
The mechanics of rigid bodies which I learned in engineering classes was mostly:
- Draw a system.
- Draw a lot of forces and constraints.
- Select a coordinate system. Mostly XYZ.
- Calculate. When something strange happen, check your forces again.
Using this approach for moving parts was pretty annoying.
But maybe there is a more elegant way to do it? I hope to use a more mathematical approach, like Langrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.
Books
I will use a couple of books.
* PRO: Is it is publicly available * PRO: It use programming for demonstration and experinats. * PRO: The authors care about didactitics. * PRO: Operator notation. D_1(f) instead of df/dx (I need mathematical notation here) * CON: They use an old version of Scheme which you need to install first.
- Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics Second Edition, V.I. Arnold. I prefer the Russian Version. There are are also translations to German and English
* PRO: More mathematical formalism. * CON: I feel that I miss some mathematics and physics knowledge to understand it.
- Курс теоретической физики Ландау и Лифшица (Course of Theoretical Physics from L. Landau and E. Lifshitz), Volume 1, Mechanics. [1]
* PRO: More physics. * PRO: Good quality, as a classical teaching book in Soviet Union. * CON: Too sloppy mathematical formalism for me. Too view intermediate steps.