Talk:Ferrocement: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Could this be used with [[air-formed domes]]? --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 13:37, 11 March 2011 (PST)
Could this be used with [[air-formed domes]]? --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 13:37, 11 March 2011 (PST)
: There are plenty of ferrocement domes, but not necessarily built with use of an air form. Air-formed domes (like Monolithic) are typically somewhat thicker than most FC structures, and only have steel rebar and not a fine mesh. --[[User:Rasmus|Rasmus]] 14:11, 11 March 2011 (PST)
: There are plenty of ferrocement domes, but not necessarily built with use of an air form. Air-formed domes (like Monolithic) are typically somewhat thicker than most FC structures, and only have steel rebar and not a fine mesh. --[[User:Rasmus|Rasmus]] 14:11, 11 March 2011 (PST)
::It seems like ferrocement binishells, don't you think? Binishells are already damn cheap to build, but with a cheaper building material than concrete, they could be even cheaper  --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 16:00, 11 March 2011 (PST)
::It seems like ferrocement binishells woul, don't you think? Binishells are already damn cheap to build, but with a cheaper building material than concrete, they could be even cheaper  --[[User:Conor|Conor]] 16:00, 11 March 2011 (PST)
d work

Revision as of 00:00, 12 March 2011

Could this be used with air-formed domes? --Conor 13:37, 11 March 2011 (PST)

There are plenty of ferrocement domes, but not necessarily built with use of an air form. Air-formed domes (like Monolithic) are typically somewhat thicker than most FC structures, and only have steel rebar and not a fine mesh. --Rasmus 14:11, 11 March 2011 (PST)
It seems like ferrocement binishells woul, don't you think? Binishells are already damn cheap to build, but with a cheaper building material than concrete, they could be even cheaper --Conor 16:00, 11 March 2011 (PST)

d work