Effective Collaboration: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Issues with current collaboration methods with open source hardware
* Time consuming to replicate (especially projects with non 3d printed parts)
State of the art in collaboration
State of the art in collaboration
* https://git-scm.com/ (Git is imo the defacto collaboration tool of the 21st century)
* https://git-scm.com/ (Git is imo the defacto collaboration protocol of the 21st century)
* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
* https://workspace.google.com/
* https://workspace.google.com/ (Convenient office file sharing, search,
* https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=MS-vsliveshare.vsliveshare-pack
* https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=MS-vsliveshare.vsliveshare-pack
* https://www.figma.com/
* https://www.figma.com/
Analysis of current collaboration methods relating to open source hardware
* Time consuming, expensive, and inconsistent to replicate non 3d printed parts. 'DIY Kits' seem to be the solution to this, but they're not always available.

Revision as of 16:29, 3 July 2021

State of the art in collaboration

Analysis of current collaboration methods relating to open source hardware

  • Time consuming, expensive, and inconsistent to replicate non 3d printed parts. 'DIY Kits' seem to be the solution to this, but they're not always available.