Solar Designs Compared: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Aluminized Mylar== | ==Aluminized Mylar== | ||
==Aluminum Mirrors== | ==Aluminum Mirrors== | ||
==Thermal Storage== | |||
=Summary Table of Designs= | =Summary Table of Designs= | ||
| Line 107: | Line 108: | ||
==Opinions== | ==Opinions== | ||
=Parabolic Dish= | =Parabolic Dish (includes Solar Fire)= | ||
==Pros== | ==Pros== | ||
Revision as of 14:52, 2 August 2011
This page is for contributors to point out the pros and cons of various solar designs for various needs. This is a suggested template for early collaborative discussion on competing designs. The index is lengthy because breaking things up allows for constant modification by many people without worrying about context. "Opinion" sections are for individually signed sections, to be changed or deleted if their opinion changes, instead of back-and-forth direct debate. Discussions should occur on the discussions page. Other sections are open for factual comment with or without a signature. OSE compatibility (as I currently understand it) should discuss level of need, modularity (double duty opportunities), lifespan, ease of construction, scalable, and design availability by 3rd party. I plan on doing a lot of work to fill in the blanks. Concentrated articles like this increase the number of incoming links, improving Google ranking. Zawy 16:32, 2 August 2011 (CEST)