Defensive Patent License: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a patent license proposed by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, directors of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the Univ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a patent license proposed by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, directors of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley as a patent licensing equivalent of the GPL copyright license.[1][2][3]
=Overview=
It requires entities licensing their patents under the DPL to license all of their patents under the DPL, with free licenses granted to all other DPL participants.[4] DPL participants remain free to launch patent lawsuits against non-participants.
 
The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a patent license proposed by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, directors of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley as a patent licensing equivalent of the GPL copyright license.
It requires entities licensing their patents under the DPL to license all of their patents under the DPL, with free licenses granted to all other DPL participants. DPL participants remain free to launch patent lawsuits against non-participants.


<html>
<html>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed//ttB_mjcIKcY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed//ttB_mjcIKcY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</html>
</html>
=Resources=
*[http://www.law.com/corporatecounsel/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1345412745563&slreturn=20120910113918 Law.com Article]


[[Category:Patents]]
[[Category:Patents]]

Revision as of 15:42, 10 October 2012

Overview

The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a patent license proposed by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, directors of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley as a patent licensing equivalent of the GPL copyright license. It requires entities licensing their patents under the DPL to license all of their patents under the DPL, with free licenses granted to all other DPL participants. DPL participants remain free to launch patent lawsuits against non-participants.

Resources