Talk:Jonathan Log: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fred Eisele (talk | contribs) (→Three Sets of Cylinders for Front Loader?: new section) |
Tibor Soviš (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I only see two sets. | I only see two sets. | ||
The bent arm on the front loader makes a big difference though. | The bent arm on the front loader makes a big difference though. | ||
== New gearbox assembly == | |||
How about implement the [http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Quick_Connect_Wheel#Reducing_loads_on_the_shafts_and_bearings Reducing loads on the shafts and bearings] idea? I mean instead of double the width of all plates weld the 4x4 tube (with shaft inside and bearings on the ends) next to existing plates. Also this chain gear makes big load to motor shaft, i think this shaft must also end with bearing mounted to the plate. Please consult with someone with constructions stress analysis skills. Btw. great work with LifeTrac design, i like it. | |||
Latest revision as of 01:25, 23 August 2013
Three Sets of Cylinders for Front Loader?
Your comment about three sets of cylinders doesn't make sense. I only see two sets. The bent arm on the front loader makes a big difference though.
New gearbox assembly
How about implement the Reducing loads on the shafts and bearings idea? I mean instead of double the width of all plates weld the 4x4 tube (with shaft inside and bearings on the ends) next to existing plates. Also this chain gear makes big load to motor shaft, i think this shaft must also end with bearing mounted to the plate. Please consult with someone with constructions stress analysis skills. Btw. great work with LifeTrac design, i like it.