CEB Press Collaboration Architecture: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


*Draw up RFPs. These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined.
*Draw up RFPs. These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined.
:*Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See [[Chunkworks]]
:*Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See [[Chunkworks]].
*'''Bidders review RFPs and submit Bids'''. Process for this needs to be defined - essentially - specific Requirements that bidders are willing to meet, and proof of qualifications.
*'''Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids'''. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages.
*Post these at opensourceecology.org, and post funding details on wiki for quick edit.
*Donations are shown in a funding basket icon.
*Donations are logged into a graph of funding as soon as donations come in - through a form that the funders themselves fill out, and that we will manage via a spreadsheet.
*Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others.
*The main concept is to show a clear graph of funding progress,
=People=
*Rafa
*Miguel
*Anthony
*Andrew
*
 
=Links=

Revision as of 20:24, 16 March 2014

edit

Simplest implementation:

  • Draw up RFPs. These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined.
  • Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See Chunkworks.
  • Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages.
  • Donations are shown in a funding basket icon.
  • Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=CEB_Press_Collaboration_Architecture&oldid=117005"