CEB Press Collaboration Architecture: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with " =People= *Rafa *Miguel *Anthony *Andrew *")
Line 1: Line 1:
<html><img src="https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1Z1BQyobFD0HJtkamzAJGCmb_oSdgicwAlrL5NvnfXKQ/pub?w=700"></html>


[https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/drawings/d/1Z1BQyobFD0HJtkamzAJGCmb_oSdgicwAlrL5NvnfXKQ/edit edit]
=People=
 
*Rafa
Simplest implementation:
*Miguel
 
*Anthony
*Draw up RFPs. These must be significant enough that visible and substantial progress is made on OSE work - but they must be small enough that they are clearly defined.
*Andrew
:*Crowd RFPs - by breaking these into the smallest tasks possible, these become shareable as social media discussions and requests. See [[Chunkworks]].
*
*'''Bidders review RFPs and submit Open Bids'''. Open process allows anybody to upload work product to the OSE Wiki. All work is submitted under the current CC-BY-SA license. Open sharing of results encourages others to collaborate and build upon each others' work. Bids are logged simply as entries on wiki pages.
*Donations are shown in a funding basket icon.
*Crowds vote for the winner. Judging criterion: quality of product AND quality of collaboration. When two comparable results are proposed, the one which showed more collaboration wins. Collaboration is assessed by how much a person borrowed from other bidders, and how much of their work was adopted by others.

Revision as of 20:24, 16 March 2014

People

  • Rafa
  • Miguel
  • Anthony
  • Andrew