Air Cars: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Cars that run on compressed air: *http://www.mdi.lu/ - Comment by MJ - However, air is not so efficient - they are claiming 70% expansion efficiency, with compression up to 6...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


*http://www.mdi.lu/ -
*http://www.mdi.lu/ -
Comment by MJ - However, air is not so efficient - they are claiming 70% expansion efficiency, with compression up to 60% efficiency  - so at best about ~40% efficient. If compressor is driven by a 30% fuel engine, that is about 10% overall efficiency. From the accessibility perspective, renewable char gas from coppiced permaculture plantouts appears to be more sustainable in terms of local energy production from a living ecosystem. If energy is obtained from renewables such as wind, the air engine would be a great case for the car. We should encourage them to opensource the air engine?
Comment by MJ - Great potential. What issues does it solve? 1. Fuel storage via air. 2. Clean burn. Disadvantage: Air is not so efficient - they are claiming 70% expansion efficiency, with compression up to 60% efficiency  - so at best about ~40% efficient. If compressor is driven by a 30% fuel engine, that is about 10% overall efficiency.  
 
Comparison from the accessibility perspective: renewable char gas from coppiced permaculture plantings appears to be more sustainable in terms of local energy production from a living ecosystem. If energy is obtained from renewables such as wind, the air engine would be a great case for the car.  
 
We should encourage them to opensource the air engine?Another question: how difficult is it to fabricate efficient air engines?
 
Summary of air cars: simply removing the point of fuel production to another place, while losing efficiency due to low efficiency of air conversion to motor power, at the benefit of a 'clean burn.'

Revision as of 04:58, 20 March 2015

Cars that run on compressed air:

Comment by MJ - Great potential. What issues does it solve? 1. Fuel storage via air. 2. Clean burn. Disadvantage: Air is not so efficient - they are claiming 70% expansion efficiency, with compression up to 60% efficiency - so at best about ~40% efficient. If compressor is driven by a 30% fuel engine, that is about 10% overall efficiency.

Comparison from the accessibility perspective: renewable char gas from coppiced permaculture plantings appears to be more sustainable in terms of local energy production from a living ecosystem. If energy is obtained from renewables such as wind, the air engine would be a great case for the car.

We should encourage them to opensource the air engine?Another question: how difficult is it to fabricate efficient air engines?

Summary of air cars: simply removing the point of fuel production to another place, while losing efficiency due to low efficiency of air conversion to motor power, at the benefit of a 'clean burn.'