EIR Review Process: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "One key to dveloplent performance is ongoing review for organizational learning. Review can take many forms. *Plans should be published for formal and informal review. FB, b...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
*An executive summary is reviewable, and should be published. Further, it should be published on an ongoing basis for improvement.
*An executive summary is reviewable, and should be published. Further, it should be published on an ongoing basis for improvement.
*A business plan is reviewable as long as it has clarity and sufficient t information for review. Revenue projections, workflows, ergonomics and time requirements, process improvements, marketing strategies, execution details, tech ology reviews, and many other elements if a business plan can be reviewed. The key is detailed analysis of each element, such that a business plan is backed up by a study of Industry Standards, market research, and other studies.
*A business plan is reviewable as long as it has clarity and sufficient t information for review. Revenue projections, workflows, ergonomics and time requirements, process improvements, marketing strategies, execution details, tech ology reviews, and many other elements if a business plan can be reviewed. The key is detailed analysis of each element, such that a business plan is backed up by a study of Industry Standards, market research, and other studies.
*SME [[DE]] webinars can be leveraged by requesting time from leaders i n the field.
*SMEs can be solicited deliberately for feedback
*An advisory team should be created from top SMEs .
*Weekly review should explore SWOT analysis, and address weaknesses by tapping strengths
*Effective means of communication should be developed to facilitate digestibility of content that is up for review.
*A formal review meeting via the internet should be organized on a regular basis, such as quarterly.
*A log should facilitate review by communicating effort, which is reviewable for time and priority allocation.
*Blog posts can update on progress, and solicit feedback. Active distribution to potential reviewers can help this.
*Monthly review can include a specific list of key issues to explore, so atemplate for monthly project review should be drawn up.

Revision as of 19:13, 11 March 2016

One key to dveloplent performance is ongoing review for organizational learning.

Review can take many forms.

  • Plans should be published for formal and informal review. FB, blog, Linked In groups can be a great source of review. For this to work, content should be published in a reviewable format.
  • An executive summary is reviewable, and should be published. Further, it should be published on an ongoing basis for improvement.
  • A business plan is reviewable as long as it has clarity and sufficient t information for review. Revenue projections, workflows, ergonomics and time requirements, process improvements, marketing strategies, execution details, tech ology reviews, and many other elements if a business plan can be reviewed. The key is detailed analysis of each element, such that a business plan is backed up by a study of Industry Standards, market research, and other studies.
  • SME DE webinars can be leveraged by requesting time from leaders i n the field.
  • SMEs can be solicited deliberately for feedback
  • An advisory team should be created from top SMEs .
  • Weekly review should explore SWOT analysis, and address weaknesses by tapping strengths
  • Effective means of communication should be developed to facilitate digestibility of content that is up for review.
  • A formal review meeting via the internet should be organized on a regular basis, such as quarterly.
  • A log should facilitate review by communicating effort, which is reviewable for time and priority allocation.
  • Blog posts can update on progress, and solicit feedback. Active distribution to potential reviewers can help this.
  • Monthly review can include a specific list of key issues to explore, so atemplate for monthly project review should be drawn up.