OSE Review Platform: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uoeAQXpxhRAWz7cpu-GTksLY10ww8m6luzyIVRKogeU/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
<html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uoeAQXpxhRAWz7cpu-GTksLY10ww8m6luzyIVRKogeU/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000" frameborder="0" width="960" height="569" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe></html>


=Notes=
=Notes=
*Add Genealogy to the infobox Template. Graphical Template for Genealogy should be developed, similar to the Roadmap templates. Each build is treated as a fork.
*Add Genealogy to the infobox Template. Graphical Template for Genealogy should be developed, similar to the Roadmap templates. Each build is treated as a fork.
*Emphasize Supersource in any design, which is part of the genetlrate nature.
*Emphasize Supersource in any design, which is part of the genetlrate nature.
*Bug requests may be desirable for branding, since any change is considered negative by some, while all options exist as modules.

Latest revision as of 00:04, 6 May 2016

Notes

  • Add Genealogy to the infobox Template. Graphical Template for Genealogy should be developed, similar to the Roadmap templates. Each build is treated as a fork.
  • Emphasize Supersource in any design, which is part of the genetlrate nature.
  • Bug requests may be desirable for branding, since any change is considered negative by some, while all options exist as modules.