Compressed Air Storage: Difference between revisions
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=2.7 million Joules | =2.7 million Joules | ||
=.75 kW hr | =.75 kW hr | ||
With 60% efficient air engines - this makes it slightly under 1/2 kWhr of energy storage. | |||
For comparison, one motorcycle battery [https://www.walmart.com/ip/EverStart-U1R-7-Lawn-Garden-Battery/16795214#about at $20]provides a comparable amount of electrical energy storage, making a weak case for compressed air storage on cost considerations. | |||
For comparison - if one could generate an average of 50W via wind power, that appears to be an easier route of power generation. | For comparison - if one could generate an average of 50W via wind power, that appears to be an easier route of power generation. |
Revision as of 13:19, 8 January 2017
Taking example calculation at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_energy_storage -
a 250 gallon propane tank stores 1 kWhr of energy when compressed to 200 PSI. Pressure rating of propane tanks is 215 PSI - [1]. Taking efficiency of an air engine - generator to be 50% - we have .5 kWhr. So a 500 gallon tank would get us 1kW hr of usable energy.
See comments below:
Calculations
For volume of 500 gallons (propane tank) -
E=Pressure x Volume.
=200 PSI x 1.9 cu meters =1,400,000 Pascals x 1.9 cu meters =2.7 million Joules =.75 kW hr
With 60% efficient air engines - this makes it slightly under 1/2 kWhr of energy storage.
For comparison, one motorcycle battery at $20provides a comparable amount of electrical energy storage, making a weak case for compressed air storage on cost considerations.
For comparison - if one could generate an average of 50W via wind power, that appears to be an easier route of power generation.