Pgp: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "*PGP = pretty good *GPG is Gnu Privacy Guard is the implementation - use it as client *Enigmail is an add-on for Thuderbird if for PGP *Both are end-to-end encryption. It wil...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
*PGP = pretty good  
*PGP = pretty good privacy. An open standard.
*GPG is Gnu Privacy Guard is the implementation - use it as client
*GPG is Gnu Privacy Guard is the implementation - use it as client
*Enigmail is an add-on for Thuderbird if for PGP
*Enigmail is an add-on for Thuderbird if for PGP
Line 8: Line 8:
*Mozilla Foundation produces Firefox (web) and Thunderbird (email)
*Mozilla Foundation produces Firefox (web) and Thunderbird (email)
*Thunderbird uses IMAP - when you mark it as read in Thunderbird, will be read in gmail
*Thunderbird uses IMAP - when you mark it as read in Thunderbird, will be read in gmail
*Enigmail is a good interface fo GPG

Revision as of 00:22, 31 January 2018

  • PGP = pretty good privacy. An open standard.
  • GPG is Gnu Privacy Guard is the implementation - use it as client
  • Enigmail is an add-on for Thuderbird if for PGP
  • Both are end-to-end encryption. It will pass thru gmail but it won't look like gibberish if you have private key
  • Usual case - confidentiality - only 2 communicators hear each other
  • Integrity - noone can mess with it in transit
  • Authentication - only I sent the message. It's impossible for someone else to send an email in my name
  • Mozilla Foundation produces Firefox (web) and Thunderbird (email)
  • Thunderbird uses IMAP - when you mark it as read in Thunderbird, will be read in gmail
  • Enigmail is a good interface fo GPG