The True Believer: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Quotes) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
the others.12 No one can then point us out, measure us against | the others.12 No one can then point us out, measure us against | ||
others and expose our inferiority. | others and expose our inferiority. | ||
*The attitude of rising mass movements toward the family is of | |||
considerable interest. Almost all our contemporary movements | |||
showed in their early stages a hostile attitude toward the family, | |||
and did all they could to discredit and disrupt it. They did it by | |||
undermining the authority of the parents; by facilitating divorce; by | |||
taking over the responsibility for feeding, educating and | |||
entertaining the children; and by encouraging illegitimacy.Crowded | |||
housing, exile, concentration camps and terror also helped to weaken and break up the family. Still, not one of our contemporary movements was so outspoken in its antagonism toward the family | |||
as was earlyChristianity. Jesus minced no words: “For I am come to | |||
set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against | |||
her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And | |||
a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth | |||
father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that | |||
loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me.” |
Revision as of 07:35, 5 February 2018
Intro
A book on mass movements by Eric Hoffer, winner of Presidential Gold Medal
Quotes
- 'There is thus a conservatism of the destitute as profound as the
conservatism of the privileged, and the former is as much a factor in the perpetuation of a social order as the latter.' -p3
- Since all mass movements draw their adherents from the same types of humanity and appeal to the same types of mind, it follows:
(a) all mass movements are competitive, and the gain of one in adherents is the loss of all the others; (b) all mass movements are interchangeable. One mass movement readily transforms itself into another. A religious movement may develop into a social revolution or a nationalist movement; a social revolution, into militant nationalism or a religious movement; a nationalist movement into a social revolution or a religious movemen
- The intensity of discontent seems to be in inverse proportion to
the distance from the object fervently desired.
- Those who see their lives as spoiled and wasted crave equality and
fraternity more than they do freedom. If they clamor for freedom, it is but freedom to establish equality and uniformity. The passion for equality is partly a passion for anonymity: to be one thread of the many which make up a tunic; one thread not distinguishable from the others.12 No one can then point us out, measure us against others and expose our inferiority.
- The attitude of rising mass movements toward the family is of
considerable interest. Almost all our contemporary movements showed in their early stages a hostile attitude toward the family, and did all they could to discredit and disrupt it. They did it by undermining the authority of the parents; by facilitating divorce; by taking over the responsibility for feeding, educating and entertaining the children; and by encouraging illegitimacy.Crowded housing, exile, concentration camps and terror also helped to weaken and break up the family. Still, not one of our contemporary movements was so outspoken in its antagonism toward the family as was earlyChristianity. Jesus minced no words: “For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me.”