Homo Sapiens: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
ancient foragers, and the complexity of their cultures, seem to be far more
ancient foragers, and the complexity of their cultures, seem to be far more
impressive than was previously suspected.
impressive than was previously suspected.
*The problem at the root of such calamities is that humans evolved for millions of
years in small bands of a few dozen individuals. The handful of millennia
separating the Agricultural Revolution from the appearance of cities, kingdoms
and empires was not enough time to allow an instinct for mass cooperation to
evolve.

Revision as of 05:21, 9 June 2018

Seminal book by Yuval Harari.

  • The currency of evolution is neither hunger nor pain, but rather copies of DNA

helixes. Just as the economic success of a company is measured only by the number of dollars in its bank account, not by the happiness of its employees, so the evolutionary success of a species is measured by the number of copies of its DNA. If no more DNA copies remain, the species is extinct, just as a company without money is bankrupt. If a species boasts many DNA copies, it is a success, and the species ɻourishes. From such a perspective, 1,000 copies are always better than a hundred copies. This is the essence of the Agricultural Revolution: the ability to keep more people alive under worse conditions.

  • Why would

any sane person lower his or her standard of living just to multiply the number of copies of the Homo sapiens genome? Nobody agreed to this deal: the Agricultural Revolution was a trap.

  • Archaeologists are familiar with such monumental structures from sites around

the world – the best-known example is Stonehenge in Britain. Yet as they studied Göbekli Tepe, they discovered an amazing fact. Stonehenge dates to 2500 BC, and was built by a developed agricultural society. The structures at Göbekli Tepe are dated to about 9500 BC, and all available evidence indicates that they were built by hunter-gatherers. The archaeological community initially found it difficult to credit these ɹndings, but one test after another conɹrmed both the early date of the structures and the pre-agricultural society of their builders. The capabilities of ancient foragers, and the complexity of their cultures, seem to be far more impressive than was previously suspected.

  • The problem at the root of such calamities is that humans evolved for millions of

years in small bands of a few dozen individuals. The handful of millennia separating the Agricultural Revolution from the appearance of cities, kingdoms and empires was not enough time to allow an instinct for mass cooperation to evolve.