The Limits of Peer Production: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
*Yet many contemporary portrayals of peer production fail to account for the ongoing | |||
importance of bureaucratic institutions in fostering and preserving knowledge that | |||
actually affords peer production. Indeed, Shirky (2008) argues for the power of ‘organiz- | |||
ing without organizations’ while ignoring the role that the university plays in his own | |||
analysis | |||
*Moreover, precisely because it is voluntary and | *Moreover, precisely because it is voluntary and | ||
usually temporary, peer production may not support the institutions upon which its own | usually temporary, peer production may not support the institutions upon which its own | ||
Revision as of 19:18, 29 December 2018
Notes
- Yet many contemporary portrayals of peer production fail to account for the ongoing
importance of bureaucratic institutions in fostering and preserving knowledge that actually affords peer production. Indeed, Shirky (2008) argues for the power of ‘organiz- ing without organizations’ while ignoring the role that the university plays in his own analysis
- Moreover, precisely because it is voluntary and
usually temporary, peer production may not support the institutions upon which its own continued success depends
- Peer production in particular may undermine our private autonomy by extending
our professional lives into formerly private arenas.
- For many scholars peer production enables individuals to achieve a form of psychological Wholeness unavailable in ordinary organizational life