Revision as of 20:53, 18 January 2019

Working Questions

How do we design Quality Control into design challenges to produce the highest quality of design? This is a central question for distributed product development
Is anyone currently running a design challenge for distributive economic good on basic transcendance of Artificial Scarcity?
Can we design an incentive challenge that goes beyond design and into Public Production Engineering (PPE) for replicability by social entrepreneurs worldwide? The requirement for PPE is that building and testing of the technology must be included.

Open source components such as 3D printed electric motor are favored. But they still have to meet performance goals. Weight limit must be maintained.
Some guidelines for part sourcing must be used - such as BLDC motors and 18650 and Arduino Mega.
For admissibility, all designs must enter a public part libary on the OSE wiki. Files under 1M are stored on the wiki.
Entry must be complete, which forces participants to collaborate and network with one another.
Nobody gets the prize unless entry is complete. Completion is verified by build + pictures.
Dev Template of critical assets is posted on every wiki page as a template
Wiki Log- consists of template on top (critical assets), time sheet, and Work Log of progress.
Charger and drill must be enclosed and follow requirements of UL Certification and CE. Entrant must show how standards would be met.
Submission package must include:

Top 10 winners are invited to 2 Day Extreme Build Competition. Video edit is required by a team member.
Winner is selected on performance data and build time. Must use documented Admissible Parts and meet performance requirements.

Make the project so large that it is simply impossible without broad collaboration of at least 100 human years, allowing for 10% efficiency typical of peer development, so 10 human years of full time effort (about $1M value at $100k/pop)
Reward X for non-native FreeCAD CAD, 1.2 to 2 x for FreeCAD native format
Production Engineering is included in settings and platform layout; nesting is considered for production optimization
Bonus for self-packaging-print parts kit on the production engineering side?
Produced on OSHWA-certified hardware for non-ambiguity
Discussion thread is set up. All infrastructure is set up so we don't need to manage the process throughout outside of casual oversight.
Commenting on the results weekly, with assessment of contenders on a blog post.
Hire someone for the posting - one month, $3k. Question is who? Abe or Jonathan.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 =Rules=
+*Open source components such as 3D printed electric motor are favored. But they still have to meet performance goals. Weight limit must be maintained.
+*Some guidelines for part sourcing must be used - such as BLDC motors and 18650 and Arduino Mega.
 *For admissibility, all designs must enter a public part libary on the OSE wiki. Files under 1M are stored on the wiki.
 *Entry must be complete, which forces participants to collaborate and network with one another.