Open Source Store: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Intro) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Meta= | |||
Governance could be about assuring everyone has access to robust productive capacity. Distributed production is the single greatest guardian of liberty. Distributed production shifts the dialogue from allocation of scarce resources to the creation of abundant resources. While taking care of nature. Read [[How Economic Localization Can Be the Greatest Measure for Safeguarding the Environment]]. | |||
=Intro= | =Intro= | ||
One of the big outstanding questions of open source product development is how to insert financial feedback loops into the process, so that we can realize mass creation of right livelihood via open source enterprise. | One of the big outstanding questions of open source product development is how to insert financial feedback loops into the process, so that we can realize mass creation of right livelihood via open source enterprise. | ||
Line 4: | Line 7: | ||
It can be theorized that an open process has the highest potential for incentivizing contributors - because everybody gets to use the value created in the process. The limit here is consciousness: whether contributors are familiar with the construct of IP being a human fiction, not a law of nature - as [[Yochai Benkler]] talks about in [[The Wealth of Networks]]. | It can be theorized that an open process has the highest potential for incentivizing contributors - because everybody gets to use the value created in the process. The limit here is consciousness: whether contributors are familiar with the construct of IP being a human fiction, not a law of nature - as [[Yochai Benkler]] talks about in [[The Wealth of Networks]]. | ||
Scarcity thinking is the villain here - in that a person thinks that if they have something of value and anyone else can use it (for example - by sharing proven, open source enterprise designs) - that will decrease the value of | Scarcity thinking is the villain here - in that a person thinks that if they have something of value and anyone else can use it (for example - by sharing proven, open source enterprise designs) - that will decrease the value of the Open Source Store for everyone. That is true for [[Rival Goods]], and the question here boils down to whether collaborative development of an Open Source Store produces a rival good. | ||
The | The Open Source Store as an entity and its realization are not a rival good if the Open Source Store provides common-use, multi-billion dollar or trillion dollar market goods. Ie, the market size is large. | ||
=Implementation= | |||
We propose that the Open Source Store is a collaboratively developed set of common goods: | |||
#Cars | |||
#Houses | |||
#3D printers | |||
#Tablets | |||
#CNC circuit mills | |||
#Trainable robots | |||
#PV panel production | |||
#Fuel production | |||
And any other common consumer good. These goods are: | |||
#Developed fully open source, OSHWA and OSI compliant hardware and software licenses | |||
#Development goes up to: | |||
#Open source product design | #Open source product design | ||
#Open source production engineering | #Open source production engineering | ||
Line 12: | Line 29: | ||
#Open source distritubed quality control | #Open source distritubed quality control | ||
#Production training for collaborators | #Production training for collaborators | ||
#Enterprise website templates | |||
In other words, a person sets up one of these and runs this as a local implementation of the Open Source Microfactory Concept. | |||
=Marketing= | |||
#The Open Source Store has a collaboratively developed marketing function where we pool marketing resources which everyone benefits from. | |||
#Everyone develops robust production capacity and quality control. OSE Certified applies to any product sold. | |||
#OSE Certified means that a product is approved by OSE as a Distributive Enterprise. This means that OSE Certified is a Distributive Enterprise certification. Only those people who contribute to the certification are able to use the certification mark. For example, someone who did not develop the product may contribute to product improvement in some form, and only then does OSE Certified use imply added value by any new user. | |||
#OSE Certified is thus part of a continued product development strategy. | |||
=Phases= | |||
#Background production as a sideline - maybe 10 hours per week on customer service, the rest is | |||
=Goals= | |||
The goal is to incentivize collaborative development of products where everyone benefits from a non-proprietary consortium. | |||
#Incentive structure to collaborate for economic benefit | #Incentive structure to collaborate for economic benefit | ||
#Complete autonomy - you control your own store front, we all develop collaboratively | #Complete autonomy - you control your own store front, we all develop collaboratively |
Revision as of 17:14, 24 February 2019
Meta
Governance could be about assuring everyone has access to robust productive capacity. Distributed production is the single greatest guardian of liberty. Distributed production shifts the dialogue from allocation of scarce resources to the creation of abundant resources. While taking care of nature. Read How Economic Localization Can Be the Greatest Measure for Safeguarding the Environment.
Intro
One of the big outstanding questions of open source product development is how to insert financial feedback loops into the process, so that we can realize mass creation of right livelihood via open source enterprise.
It can be theorized that an open process has the highest potential for incentivizing contributors - because everybody gets to use the value created in the process. The limit here is consciousness: whether contributors are familiar with the construct of IP being a human fiction, not a law of nature - as Yochai Benkler talks about in The Wealth of Networks.
Scarcity thinking is the villain here - in that a person thinks that if they have something of value and anyone else can use it (for example - by sharing proven, open source enterprise designs) - that will decrease the value of the Open Source Store for everyone. That is true for Rival Goods, and the question here boils down to whether collaborative development of an Open Source Store produces a rival good.
The Open Source Store as an entity and its realization are not a rival good if the Open Source Store provides common-use, multi-billion dollar or trillion dollar market goods. Ie, the market size is large.
Implementation
We propose that the Open Source Store is a collaboratively developed set of common goods:
- Cars
- Houses
- 3D printers
- Tablets
- CNC circuit mills
- Trainable robots
- PV panel production
- Fuel production
And any other common consumer good. These goods are:
- Developed fully open source, OSHWA and OSI compliant hardware and software licenses
- Development goes up to:
- Open source product design
- Open source production engineering
- Open source supply chain
- Open source distritubed quality control
- Production training for collaborators
- Enterprise website templates
In other words, a person sets up one of these and runs this as a local implementation of the Open Source Microfactory Concept.
Marketing
- The Open Source Store has a collaboratively developed marketing function where we pool marketing resources which everyone benefits from.
- Everyone develops robust production capacity and quality control. OSE Certified applies to any product sold.
- OSE Certified means that a product is approved by OSE as a Distributive Enterprise. This means that OSE Certified is a Distributive Enterprise certification. Only those people who contribute to the certification are able to use the certification mark. For example, someone who did not develop the product may contribute to product improvement in some form, and only then does OSE Certified use imply added value by any new user.
- OSE Certified is thus part of a continued product development strategy.
Phases
- Background production as a sideline - maybe 10 hours per week on customer service, the rest is
Goals
The goal is to incentivize collaborative development of products where everyone benefits from a non-proprietary consortium.
- Incentive structure to collaborate for economic benefit
- Complete autonomy - you control your own store front, we all develop collaboratively
- OSE Brand - we all subscribe to the OSE Social Contract - an aspirational level of principles. People in the collaboratory can get OSE-branded website, which is part of the enterprise
- Incentive structure - you commit to learning and earning.
- Learning is required for industrial productivity on a small scale
Goal
- Goal is to create the open source economy by funding OSE's open source product development for an open source technology kernel for civilization
- All resources are committed to R&D and installation of prototype facilities
- OSS participants allocate revenue to an experimental facility, willingly
- Specific implementation is a Village Campus, built around the OSS operation. We acquire land for the resource provision aspect of the operation.
- We strive to make land the ultimate supply chain - a proposition worth many Nobel-level peace prizes.