Six Factor Design: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
#Design for Lifecycle stewardship
#Design for Lifecycle stewardship
One major gap here -
One major gap here -
#Design for human benefit - exonomic distribution. Distributive Enterprise (as opposed to [[Redistributive]]
#Design for human benefit - economic distribution. Distributive Enterprise (as opposed to [[Redistributive]]). Human benefit as such implies open source, collaborative development.
 
Note that collaborative development can be proprietary - so a distinction must be made in OSE language to point out that the development must be inclusive or open. The [[OSE Vision]] captures this.

Latest revision as of 19:33, 8 May 2019

  1. Performance
  2. Cost
  3. Speed of build
  4. Ease of Build
  5. Design for repair
  6. Design for Lifecycle stewardship

One major gap here -

  1. Design for human benefit - economic distribution. Distributive Enterprise (as opposed to Redistributive). Human benefit as such implies open source, collaborative development.

Note that collaborative development can be proprietary - so a distinction must be made in OSE language to point out that the development must be inclusive or open. The OSE Vision captures this.