A Players: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "OSE focuses on partners, not employees. Here are comments about great employees: *10 things really amazing employees do - Inc - [https://www.inc.com/kevin-daum/10-things-real...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


*10 things really amazing employees do - Inc - [https://www.inc.com/kevin-daum/10-things-really-amazing-employees-do.html]
*10 things really amazing employees do - Inc - [https://www.inc.com/kevin-daum/10-things-really-amazing-employees-do.html]
*A great engineer is worth 100 average ones - Zuckerberg
*''But this is only part of the story. A-players need a pat on the back now and again. What’s interesting is that they only value pats on the back from other A-players. They don’t value the approval unless they respect and admire the person giving it. So developing a critical mass of A-players has an added benefit: The company tends to repel B-players and attract other A-players, reinforcing what it has built. Zappos employed this theory when it famously offered its employees $2,000 to quit under the assumption that A-players aren’t motivated by money and only B-players would take the deal.'' - [https://venturebeat.com/2012/06/30/why-startups-should-only-hire-a-players/]

Revision as of 22:55, 15 August 2019

OSE focuses on partners, not employees. Here are comments about great employees:

  • 10 things really amazing employees do - Inc - [1]
  • A great engineer is worth 100 average ones - Zuckerberg
  • But this is only part of the story. A-players need a pat on the back now and again. What’s interesting is that they only value pats on the back from other A-players. They don’t value the approval unless they respect and admire the person giving it. So developing a critical mass of A-players has an added benefit: The company tends to repel B-players and attract other A-players, reinforcing what it has built. Zappos employed this theory when it famously offered its employees $2,000 to quit under the assumption that A-players aren’t motivated by money and only B-players would take the deal. - [2]