Sensorica: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[OSI]] compliant licenses. | *This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[OSI]] compliant licenses. | ||
*Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to [[Collaborative Waste]]. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses. | *Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to [[Collaborative Waste]]. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses. | ||
*Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible. | |||
Revision as of 20:58, 28 March 2020
Critique
- This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, OSHWA and OSI compliant licenses.
- Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to Collaborative Waste. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses.
- Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible.