Sensorica: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Critique= | =Critique= | ||
*This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[OSI]] compliant licenses. | *This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, [[OSHWA]] and [[OSI]] compliant licenses. Open source licenses were created to address the attribution issue: voluntary attribution, without contribution-accounting overhead. | ||
*Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to [[Collaborative Waste]]. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses. | *Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to [[Collaborative Waste]]. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses. | ||
*Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible. | *Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible. | ||
*System is based on innovation of corporate form. That is good. But OVN is not the only way to a non-hierarchical system. Free enterprise (free as in freedom, ethical, and inclusive of humans and nature) | *System is based on innovation of corporate form. That is good. But OVN is not the only way to a non-hierarchical system. Free enterprise (free as in freedom, ethical, and inclusive of humans and nature) | ||
*OVN is fundamentally exclusive. Without open licensing, it creates 'outsiders' - those who do not join the network. This form of coercion is avoided in permissive open source licenses such as MIT License or CC-BY, and is partly avoided in non-permissive open source licenses such as GPL or CC-BY-SA. | *OVN is fundamentally exclusive. Without open licensing, it creates 'outsiders' - those who do not join the network. This form of coercion is avoided in permissive open source licenses such as MIT License or CC-BY, and is partly avoided in non-permissive open source licenses such as GPL or CC-BY-SA. | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 28 March 2020
Critique
- This has great potential, however, the concept would benefit from using open source, OSHWA and OSI compliant licenses. Open source licenses were created to address the attribution issue: voluntary attribution, without contribution-accounting overhead.
- Value acconting must be evaluated for each project. This imposes significant overhead to any project, and consitutes to Collaborative Waste. This is a problem resolved by choosing open source licenses.
- Value accounting is a fundamental problem that is addressed via exchange relationships: ie, value is negotiated prior to any exchange. Value cannot be determined a priori. Thus, emphasis on an a-priori value accounting system is a fundamnetal impossibility, and fair exchange of value is not possible.
- System is based on innovation of corporate form. That is good. But OVN is not the only way to a non-hierarchical system. Free enterprise (free as in freedom, ethical, and inclusive of humans and nature)
- OVN is fundamentally exclusive. Without open licensing, it creates 'outsiders' - those who do not join the network. This form of coercion is avoided in permissive open source licenses such as MIT License or CC-BY, and is partly avoided in non-permissive open source licenses such as GPL or CC-BY-SA.