Low Tech Magazine on Compressed Air Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Notes= | =Notes= | ||
*40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries. | *40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries. | ||
*Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient. | |||
Revision as of 20:16, 1 April 2020
Article
- Low Tech Magazine article - [1]
Notes
- 40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries.
- Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient.