Low Tech Magazine on Compressed Air Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries. | *40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries. | ||
*Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient. | *Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient. | ||
*[[Scroll Compressor]] is nearly 100% efficient, but expensive. | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 1 April 2020
Article
- Low Tech Magazine article - [1]
Notes
- 40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries.
- Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient.
- Scroll Compressor is nearly 100% efficient, but expensive.