Revision as of 21:16, 1 April 2020

Article

40-50% efficiency of air storage, compared to 70-90% for batteries.
Pumping and air engines are 60-70% efficient.
Scroll Compressor is nearly 100% efficient, but expensive.
Highest ESOI of any energy source - [2]
Conclusion of Reference [7] - The sizing of storage tanks for a SHS-CAES has been determine by modeling all the components downstream of the storage tank. To operate the system with SHS load of 29.65W for 12 hours requires a tank size of 18 m3, with an initial pressure of 8 bar and regulator setting 3.511 bar.
8 bar system operates at around 60% roundtrip efficiency - that is impressive.
P. 60 of thesis [3] shows the size of tank required for 3kWhr storage - 65 cubic meter.
P. 54 of reference [8] [4] shows only 5% efficiency of overall system was obtained, calculating the total wattage of output to the total wattage of input. This is about 10x less than a claimed 50% efficiency of air storage. What gives?
P. 60 of Ref [8] states that tank cost would be $30k.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *P. 60 of thesis [https://eprints.usq.edu.au/24651/1/Herriman_2013.pdf] shows the size of tank required for 3kWhr storage - 65 cubic meter.
 *P. 54 of reference [8] [https://eprints.usq.edu.au/24651/1/Herriman_2013.pdf] shows only 5% efficiency of overall system was obtained, calculating the total wattage of output to the total wattage of input. This is about 10x less than a claimed 50% efficiency of air storage. What gives?
+*P. 60 of Ref [8] states that tank cost would be $30k.