White Paper on Open Collaboration: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=Abstract=
=Abstract=


[[Open Source Product Development]] has the potential to produce a historic transfer of wealth from fincance capital to production. Specifically, we propose [[Open Source Microfactories]] or [[Open Source Fab Labs]] as the production mechanism, based on global repositories of open source design.  
[[Open Source Product Development]] has the potential to produce a historic transfer of wealth from fincance capital to production. Specifically, we propose [[Open Source Microfactories]] or [[Open Source Fab Labs]] as the production mechanism, based on global repositories of open source design. The distribution model is industrial productivity on a small scale and $100/hr revenue rate, thereby requiring 25% effort to fund a full life at $4k/month (2 hours of work per day, no more). The assymption is that
 
The distribution model is industrial productivity on a small scale via open source microfactories and $100/hr revenue rate, thereby requiring 25% effort to fund a full life at $4k/month.


=Asking the Right Question=
=Asking the Right Question=

Revision as of 18:59, 3 June 2020

Abstract

Open Source Product Development has the potential to produce a historic transfer of wealth from fincance capital to production. Specifically, we propose Open Source Microfactories or Open Source Fab Labs as the production mechanism, based on global repositories of open source design. The distribution model is industrial productivity on a small scale and $100/hr revenue rate, thereby requiring 25% effort to fund a full life at $4k/month (2 hours of work per day, no more). The assymption is that

Asking the Right Question

  1. Why do people not collaborate on open source product development, if clearly the benefit is growing the pie for everybody?

Is that even the right question to ask? Maybe, why do people think they are collaborating, but are not really?

MJ Case

I had some breakthroughs on collaboration through coaching, in 2019. I got away from how do I have to do it, to how do we do it. Psychologically, the burden of Jesus lifts by saying this. It's enabled by full commitment to the answer, letting go of ego, and being vulnerable to saying that WE can do it, and that is based on full acceptance of post-scarcity thinking in that I believe firmly that there is more than enough for everybody. This is very logical from first principles, where absolutely no case can be made for scarcity, even if the population rises from few billion to one one trillion (I don't advocate that).

Survey

Let's start by surveying various people as to why they don't collaborate. Say they are working on projects. And they have the option to work with others. Do they look forward to it? What are the blocks?

Blocks

Let's list a few, and see if we can narrow it down to a few key ones.

  1. Lack of clarity, experience, or execution ability on management.
  2. I am already collaborating
  3. My work is already open source.
  4. I can get more done myself. Real answer is: I don't know what protocols can be used for wider collaborative dev.
  5. It takes too much organizational effort
  6. My ego is too big
  7. I am too greedy
  8. I don't know how to work with people
  9. I am shy
  10. I am a superstar, I don't need anyone else
  11. I have a pet project, and I don't care about solving larger issues
  12. My issue is superimportant, there is nothing more important than it.

Links