Solar Shipping: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
1 container ship creates as much pollution as 50M cars. | 1 container ship creates as much pollution as 50M cars. | ||
A large container ship uses 80MW of power. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rtsil%C3%A4-Sulzer_RTA96-C]. This makes the surface area of a solar ship 1/17 the power. Cost of engine? Hard to tell. If 2300 tons, then $5M if cost of engine is a dollar per pound. It's likely much more than that. So the cost of replacing with PV is equivalent, probably much cheaper if we discount the electric motor cost. | A large container ship uses 80MW of power. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rtsil%C3%A4-Sulzer_RTA96-C]. This makes the surface area of a solar ship 1/17 the power. Cost of engine? Hard to tell. If 2300 tons, then $5M if cost of engine is a dollar per pound. It's likely much more than that. A 2MW diesel locomotive is up to $2M for comparison. So the cost of replacing with PV is equivalent, probably much cheaper if we discount the electric motor cost on the cargo ship. However, electric motors are highly modular, so probably not a bad deal to go with electric for lifetime and simplicity. | ||
Diesel locomitives are 2.2MW [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotive#:~:text=In%20a%20diesel%E2%80%93electric%20locomotive,provides%20power%20to%20the%20traction]. | Diesel locomitives are 2.2MW [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotive#:~:text=In%20a%20diesel%E2%80%93electric%20locomotive,provides%20power%20to%20the%20traction]. | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 24 July 2020
Cargo Container Ships
On a solar ship - how many solar panels of 20% efficiency can fit on it- using the surface area of the largest container ship [1]. A container ship of 500 TEU [2] capacity costs $10M, and a used one goes for $4M. [3]. Largest container ship is 400x60 meters, or 24,000 square meters. [4]
Small container ships weigh 50k tons. Large ones weigh 200k tons. [5]
Each square meter produces .2kW at best. That makes it 4800kW.
$400/kw. $2M for the panels.
Cargo ship uses 16 tons of fuel per hour. Fuel cost is $300/ton. $38M/year in fuel.
About 8000 hours per year. 16x300x8000=$38M. It is about $100M for a 12k TEU container ship [6]. This means solar payback time is under 1 month. PV costs less than the engine itself. 1 container ship creates as much pollution as 50M cars.
A large container ship uses 80MW of power. [7]. This makes the surface area of a solar ship 1/17 the power. Cost of engine? Hard to tell. If 2300 tons, then $5M if cost of engine is a dollar per pound. It's likely much more than that. A 2MW diesel locomotive is up to $2M for comparison. So the cost of replacing with PV is equivalent, probably much cheaper if we discount the electric motor cost on the cargo ship. However, electric motors are highly modular, so probably not a bad deal to go with electric for lifetime and simplicity.
Diesel locomitives are 2.2MW [8].
With telescoping panels, solar can match industry standards.
Night time power - could be addressed via solar hydrogen production.