Defensive Patent License: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Added Another Category to The Page) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=Resources= | =Resources= | ||
*[[Defensive Publications]] | |||
*[http://www.law.com/corporatecounsel/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1345412745563&slreturn=20120910113918 Law.com Article] | *[http://www.law.com/corporatecounsel/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1345412745563&slreturn=20120910113918 Law.com Article] | ||
[[Category: Corporate Law]] [[Category: Patents]] | |||
[[Category:Patents]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:39, 9 August 2020
Overview
The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a patent license proposed by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, directors of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley as a patent licensing equivalent of the GPL copyright license. It requires entities licensing their patents under the DPL to license all of their patents under the DPL, with free licenses granted to all other DPL participants. DPL participants remain free to launch patent lawsuits against non-participants.