Open Source Camera Development: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Intro= Fully open source hardware camera is doable using Beagle Bone open microcomputer, a touch screen, a photodetector chip, lens, battery pack module. The concept is to p...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Fully open source hardware camera is doable using Beagle Bone open microcomputer, a touch screen, a photodetector chip, lens, battery pack module. The concept is to produce modular design that cost, say $100, for a state of art, professional grade cinema comparable to Apertus but at 1/10 the cost. | Fully open source hardware camera is doable using Beagle Bone open microcomputer, a touch screen, a photodetector chip, lens, battery pack module. The concept is to produce modular design that cost, say $100, for a state of art, professional grade cinema comparable to Apertus but at 1/10 the cost. | ||
The cost is kept low by modular parts, which are part of a toolset of interchangeable parts that never lose their value. And eventually we go to [[ | The cost is kept low by modular parts, which are part of a toolset of interchangeable parts that never lose their value. And eventually we go to [[Libre Silicon]] for producing the chips. | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 7 September 2020
Intro
Fully open source hardware camera is doable using Beagle Bone open microcomputer, a touch screen, a photodetector chip, lens, battery pack module. The concept is to produce modular design that cost, say $100, for a state of art, professional grade cinema comparable to Apertus but at 1/10 the cost.
The cost is kept low by modular parts, which are part of a toolset of interchangeable parts that never lose their value. And eventually we go to Libre Silicon for producing the chips.