Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<html><iframe src="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open Source Ecology" width=100% height= | <html><iframe src="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open Source Ecology" width=100% height=400> | ||
</iframe></html> | </iframe></html> | ||
*"Wikipedia is absolutely unique in that it’s a nonprofit operating in the space of multibillion-dollar brands,” - [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/12/02/wikipedia-has-a-ton-of-money-so-why-is-it-begging-you-to-donate-yours/?utm_term=.96e93f72ebe6] | *"Wikipedia is absolutely unique in that it’s a nonprofit operating in the space of multibillion-dollar brands,” - [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/12/02/wikipedia-has-a-ton-of-money-so-why-is-it-begging-you-to-donate-yours/?utm_term=.96e93f72ebe6] | ||
*$30M budget, 300 employees | *$30M budget, 300 employees | ||
*1% of editors, about 1200 at any time, write 77% of content. Not bad. But could be better. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/7x47bb/wikipedia-editors-elite-diversity-foundation]. 84% of editors are male. Not surprising given that Wikipedia was initially funded by revenue from a porn business. | *1% of editors, about 1200 at any time, write 77% of content. Not bad. But could be better. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/7x47bb/wikipedia-editors-elite-diversity-foundation]. 84% of editors are male. Not surprising given that Wikipedia was initially funded by revenue from a porn business, but jokes aside - the gender ratio reflects a typical male-domination in the field of software and internet enterprise. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:21, 18 October 2020
- "Wikipedia is absolutely unique in that it’s a nonprofit operating in the space of multibillion-dollar brands,” - [1]
- $30M budget, 300 employees
- 1% of editors, about 1200 at any time, write 77% of content. Not bad. But could be better. [2]. 84% of editors are male. Not surprising given that Wikipedia was initially funded by revenue from a porn business, but jokes aside - the gender ratio reflects a typical male-domination in the field of software and internet enterprise.