Stupid Shit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This page is dedicated to studying proprietary information and enclosure of the commons, such as: #Prorprietary research that discloses models but does not provide source code...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is dedicated to studying proprietary information and enclosure of the commons, such as: | This page is dedicated to studying proprietary information and enclosure of the commons, such as: | ||
#Prorprietary research that discloses models but does not provide source code for replicating the work. As such, this is bad science, as it is not replicable and is 'see but don't touch' only. Corrections are welcome - if you see that source code or enabling knowhow is revealed, and the paper is a case of poor communication - please let us know. As a general rule, when source code is not disclosed in publications, we assume that the source code is proprietary. | |||
#Prorprietary research - that discloses models but does not provide source code for replicating the work. As such, this is bad science, as it is not replicable and is 'see but don't touch' only. Corrections are welcome - if you see that source code or enabling knowhow is revealed, and the paper is a case of poor communication - please let us know. As a general rule, when source code is not disclosed in publications, we assume that the source code is proprietary - even though it may come from public institutions. | |||
The intent of this page is to provide case studies and gain insights on how collaboration is missing throughout human institutions - and how to address these gaps as we create the open source economy. | The intent of this page is to provide case studies and gain insights on how collaboration is missing throughout human institutions - and how to address these gaps as we create the open source economy. | ||
*http://geometry.cs.ucl.ac.uk/projects/2014/works-like/ - no source code | *http://geometry.cs.ucl.ac.uk/projects/2014/works-like/ - no source code. Counterexample of designs with source code - [https://koyama.xyz/project/AutoConnect/supplemental.pdf] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 5 November 2020
This page is dedicated to studying proprietary information and enclosure of the commons, such as:
- Prorprietary research - that discloses models but does not provide source code for replicating the work. As such, this is bad science, as it is not replicable and is 'see but don't touch' only. Corrections are welcome - if you see that source code or enabling knowhow is revealed, and the paper is a case of poor communication - please let us know. As a general rule, when source code is not disclosed in publications, we assume that the source code is proprietary - even though it may come from public institutions.
The intent of this page is to provide case studies and gain insights on how collaboration is missing throughout human institutions - and how to address these gaps as we create the open source economy.
- http://geometry.cs.ucl.ac.uk/projects/2014/works-like/ - no source code. Counterexample of designs with source code - [1]