Worse is Better Philosophy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Something that just works, is bare bones, is better for wide adoption than a polished product that takes long to get to market. Aka the New Jersey Approach, lol, i'm from New Jersey. | Something that just works, is bare bones, is better for wide adoption than a polished product that takes long to get to market. Aka the New Jersey Approach, lol, i'm from New Jersey. | ||
The property that makes for Worse-is-Better being attractive is modularity - easy improvability and adaptability. This is also known as Growable-is-Better. | |||
https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/cs181/projects/2010-11/WorseIsBetter/index.php/Growable-is-better.html | https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/cs181/projects/2010-11/WorseIsBetter/index.php/Growable-is-better.html | ||
https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/cs181/projects/2010-11/WorseIsBetter/index.php/Worse-is-better.html | https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/cs181/projects/2010-11/WorseIsBetter/index.php/Worse-is-better.html | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 3 February 2021
Something that just works, is bare bones, is better for wide adoption than a polished product that takes long to get to market. Aka the New Jersey Approach, lol, i'm from New Jersey.
The property that makes for Worse-is-Better being attractive is modularity - easy improvability and adaptability. This is also known as Growable-is-Better.