6 Ds of Tech Disruption: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The 6Ds of tech disruption do not address true distribution of wealth - nor environmental or social justice. They rely largely on empowering the empowered. We cannot argue abo...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The 6Ds of tech disruption do not address true distribution of wealth - nor environmental or social justice. They rely largely on empowering the empowered. We cannot argue about the trickle down, but true distribution of wealth is questionable. OSE's paradigm involves leaving nobody behind, or a distributed paradigm. From the outside, the 6Ds promise distribution - but in their execution - they don't appear to do that. | This is a framework for how exponential technology changes the work, proposed by [[Peter Diamandis]]. The 6Ds of tech disruption do not address true distribution of wealth - nor environmental or social justice. They rely largely on empowering the empowered. We cannot argue about the trickle down, but true distribution of wealth is questionable. OSE's paradigm involves leaving nobody behind, or a distributed paradigm. From the outside, the 6Ds promise distribution - but in their execution - they don't appear to do that. | ||
https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/#sm.00001hncwl88i4d5is1esbxx3u3ln | https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/#sm.00001hncwl88i4d5is1esbxx3u3ln | ||
Revision as of 23:10, 13 March 2021
This is a framework for how exponential technology changes the work, proposed by Peter Diamandis. The 6Ds of tech disruption do not address true distribution of wealth - nor environmental or social justice. They rely largely on empowering the empowered. We cannot argue about the trickle down, but true distribution of wealth is questionable. OSE's paradigm involves leaving nobody behind, or a distributed paradigm. From the outside, the 6Ds promise distribution - but in their execution - they don't appear to do that.