Compressed Air Storage: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:


<html><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FOpenSourceEcology%2Fposts%2F10154900144236562%3A0&width=500" width="500" height="579" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></html>
<html><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FOpenSourceEcology%2Fposts%2F10154900144236562%3A0&width=500" width="500" height="579" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></html>
=Storage Math=
*500 gal propane take - 66 cu ft x10 = 660 cu ft. Cost is
=Cost=
*500 gal propane tanks - $1600 [https://www.kleen-ritecorp.com/p-37895-500-gallon-above-ground-propane-tank-asme.aspx]
*$1500 for 500 gal + double for install [https://homeguide.com/costs/propane-tank-cost]
=Calculations=
=Calculations=



Revision as of 22:27, 31 July 2021

Intro

Taking example calculation at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_energy_storage -

a 500 gallon propane tank stores .75 kWhr of energy when compressed to 200 PSI. Pressure rating of propane tanks is 215 PSI - [1]. Taking efficiency of an air engine - generator to be 50% - we have .4 kWhr. So a 500 gallon tank would get us 0.4 kW hr of usable energy.

See comments below:

Storage Math

  • 500 gal propane take - 66 cu ft x10 = 660 cu ft. Cost is

Cost

  • 500 gal propane tanks - $1600 [2]
  • $1500 for 500 gal + double for install [3]

Calculations

For volume of 500 gallons (propane tank) -

E=Pressure x Volume.

=200 PSI x 1.9 cu meters
=1,400,000 Pascals x 1.9 cu meters
=2.7 million Joules
=.75 kW hr

With 60% efficient air engines - this makes it slightly under 1/2 kWhr of energy storage.

For comparison, one motorcycle battery at $20provides a comparable amount of electrical energy storage, making a weak case for compressed air storage on cost considerations.

For comparison - if one could generate an average of 50W via wind power, that appears to be an easier route of power generation.

Links

  • EPRI head states that air will be cheaper per watt hr store than batteries. - [4]
  • Cost Comparison of Energy Storage - [5]

Comments?