Compressed Air Storage: Difference between revisions
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=Storage Math= | =Storage Math= | ||
*500 gal propane take - 66 cu ft x10 = 660 cu ft. Cost is $1500 + installation | *500 gal propane take - 66 cu ft x10 = 660 cu ft. Cost is $1500 + installation | ||
*250 cu ft is $ | *250 cu ft is $300 for [[Type K Cylinder]]. | ||
**Advantage here is high modularity. | |||
=Cost= | =Cost= |
Revision as of 22:29, 31 July 2021
Intro
Taking example calculation at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_energy_storage -
a 500 gallon propane tank stores .75 kWhr of energy when compressed to 200 PSI. Pressure rating of propane tanks is 215 PSI - [1]. Taking efficiency of an air engine - generator to be 50% - we have .4 kWhr. So a 500 gallon tank would get us 0.4 kW hr of usable energy.
See comments below:
Storage Math
- 500 gal propane take - 66 cu ft x10 = 660 cu ft. Cost is $1500 + installation
- 250 cu ft is $300 for Type K Cylinder.
- Advantage here is high modularity.
Cost
Calculations
For volume of 500 gallons (propane tank) -
E=Pressure x Volume.
=200 PSI x 1.9 cu meters =1,400,000 Pascals x 1.9 cu meters =2.7 million Joules =.75 kW hr
With 60% efficient air engines - this makes it slightly under 1/2 kWhr of energy storage.
For comparison, one motorcycle battery at $20provides a comparable amount of electrical energy storage, making a weak case for compressed air storage on cost considerations.
- However, a motorcycle bat will last you a year, whereas the tank will be unlimited lifetime.
For comparison - if one could generate an average of 50W via wind power, that appears to be an easier route of power generation.
Links
- EPRI head states that air will be cheaper per watt hr store than batteries. - [4]
- Cost Comparison of Energy Storage - [5]