Dyson Cinetic Cyclonic Seperation Technology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Minor Typo Fix) |
(Added some more links under the "External Links" section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*It supposedly was able to filter dust down to [[HEPA]] standards all with no filter (ALTHOGH one was added as a failsafe) | *It supposedly was able to filter dust down to [[HEPA]] standards all with no filter (ALTHOGH one was added as a failsafe) | ||
*If it could be replicated, it would be especially interesting in that it would reduce/eliminate the need of filters, which makes any design more cost effective (in theory at least) and also uses more [[Appropriate Materials]] | *If it could be replicated, it would be especially interesting in that it would reduce/eliminate the need of filters, which makes any design more cost effective (in theory at least) and also uses more [[Appropriate Materials]] | ||
*Supposedly the tip of the cyclone had to be made of some (Proprietary... (but not [[Reverse Engineering | Reverse Engineerable]] via a [[Shore Durometer]] !) [[Elastomer]] so as to vibrate and "shake free" any clogs | |||
=Internal Links= | =Internal Links= | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
=External Links= | =External Links= | ||
* | *[https://www.dyson.com/vacuum-cleaners/uprights/cinetic-big-ball The Section of the Dyson Website on This] | ||
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3MefmIot6M A Video by the YouTube Channel "Vacuum Facts" Titled "Dyson Cinetic Myths – Testing How Good It Really is!"] (Showcases it's capability with data to back it up (may need replication + verification, but otherwise good) ) also discusses some of it's non-[[R2R]] friendly aspects, but does a [[Full Teardown]] anyways | |||
Latest revision as of 02:18, 1 November 2021
Basics
- This was a Cyclonic Separation Technology that follows some of their Vacuum Cleaner's Primary and Secondary Cyclones
- It supposedly was able to filter dust down to HEPA standards all with no filter (ALTHOGH one was added as a failsafe)
- If it could be replicated, it would be especially interesting in that it would reduce/eliminate the need of filters, which makes any design more cost effective (in theory at least) and also uses more Appropriate Materials
- Supposedly the tip of the cyclone had to be made of some (Proprietary... (but not Reverse Engineerable via a Shore Durometer !) Elastomer so as to vibrate and "shake free" any clogs
Internal Links
External Links
- The Section of the Dyson Website on This
- A Video by the YouTube Channel "Vacuum Facts" Titled "Dyson Cinetic Myths – Testing How Good It Really is!" (Showcases it's capability with data to back it up (may need replication + verification, but otherwise good) ) also discusses some of it's non-R2R friendly aspects, but does a Full Teardown anyways