Russian Invastion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Truth Wins= | =Truth Wins= | ||
*Here's a possitive outlook - [https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/2/28/truths-in-a-time-of-war] | *Here's a possitive outlook - [https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/2/28/truths-in-a-time-of-war] | ||
=Military Analysis= | |||
*Air Force Magazine - [https://www.airforcemag.com/us-air-force-discusses-tactics-with-ukrainian-air-force-as-russian-advance-stalls/] | |||
=Losses= | =Losses= | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 3 March 2022
Truth Wins
- Here's a possitive outlook - [1]
Military Analysis
- Air Force Magazine - [2]
Losses
Military Aid Needs
- Mar 1 - in Defense News - [5]
Intro
Recents on Twitter - https://twitter.com/search?q=ukraine%20news&src=typed_query&f=live
Check out this contrarian viewpoint - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vdiEABLFoo from the feed. at about 4 AM Sunday CST USA. From Coach Red Pill on Telegram. How fascinating.
It is interesting to see the arguments promoted by each side. From the assumptions that the good or evil side takes, their respective conclusions appear sound. Their conclusions depend on the assumptions that they are making. And assumptions depend on admissible information - which information the viewpoint includes and which it omits in its considerations. And what values it holds. Thus, one could gain reconciliation or admit to differences based on admissible information and therefore the assumptions made.