Brave New War: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=OSE Perspective= | =OSE Perspective= | ||
The open source economy is a critical reframe of the thinking around global security. The open source economy must be recognized as an aspect of global security. This point needs to be communicated. It's more than about the lame maker movement. It's about tactics towards world peace. | The open source economy is a critical reframe of the thinking around global security. The open source economy must be recognized as an aspect of global security. This point needs to be communicated. It's more than about the lame ''maker movement''. It's about tactics towards world peace. | ||
Revision as of 23:20, 19 April 2022
Background
Laura Jackson proposes a similarly preemptive approach for the Three Warfares, encouraging the permanent stationing of cameras on military vessels in the South China Sea and the satellite streaming of Chinese island construction to better stop “unilateral, yet subtle, revisions of reality.” Mark Galeotti, a professor at New York University, advocates a “non-kinetic NATO” equipped to counter challenges such as corruption. Russian doctrine argues that corrupting another country’s elites is part of “new-generation” war. Isn’t it therefore time for the West to consider corruption a security issue?
OSE Perspective
The open source economy is a critical reframe of the thinking around global security. The open source economy must be recognized as an aspect of global security. This point needs to be communicated. It's more than about the lame maker movement. It's about tactics towards world peace.