Briar Patch Observatory Podcast: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
*There's a limit to how shitty google can become.
*There's a limit to how shitty google can become.
*Ex. Page Rank - made Google successful. This was a decentralized mechanism.
*Ex. Page Rank - made Google successful. This was a decentralized mechanism.
*Google will lose dominance at some point. Very vulnerable in ways. 1. They tried machine learning - cornering the market. Didn't succeed. Someone will come out with a 100x better machine learning algorithm.
*2 - another mortal threat. Ad-blockers vs Ad-sellers. Ad blockers will get an upper hand at one point, collapsing the system.

Revision as of 17:46, 23 April 2022

  • https://briarpod.net/. https://twitter.com/PLanghaus
  • Pedro Domingues - seminal book on machine learning.
  • George Hotz - open source people. Open source self-driving cars.
  • Centralized vs decentralization - some things work better than not in a decentralized. We must observe - what emerges? Does an army work better centralized? Decent. Nimbler. Centralized command can be slow. Decentralized army does not end up winning a war. You want centralized decision making, but communication about lessons learned.
  • Where we organize centralized or decent - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Hotz. Post-modernist - don't believe in grand theories.
  • Individual sovereignity - a technical problem. If I have a box that makes food, water, shelter - why do you need the state?
  • Replace the state - better technical not ideological. State loses, freedom wins. Focus as a technical question not political one.
  • What about protection? Defense wins over offense.
  • Whether offense or defense wins - depends on time. In military history - it shifted. Defense may work.
  • Why we need to defend ourselves.
  • George dissociates from power. If you have
  • You may not be interested in politics, but politics are interested in you - Trotsky.
  • Algorithms. China does AI for oppression.
  • Desire slaves!
  • Ask everybody if they would want to be the king of the world? Oppression is very costly.
  • Democracy -
  • Algorithms.
  • Pedro - constitution was designed so idiots could run it.
  • Ex. Separtion of power vs checks and balances. Sharing power so no branch could dominate others.
  • Pedro - not good enough if you have small fiefdoms of freedom in a centralized world. Dynamics that made it happen - are positive feedback loop for centralization.
  • Centralized platform also provides freedom for decentralization - small businesses, etc. Amazon sellers.
  • Platforms are centralized. But opens up opportunity for decentralization.
  • Where does the platform end, and user begin?
  • Platforms as monopolies - they are not that big. Ex. Vampire vs Twitter - $1B to switch over. George is not worrried about platform dominance.
  • Network effects - can transcend by incentivizing other platforms?
  • To take over a platform - is very difficult. A better search engine will not take down Google. It is data that backs up the old one.
  • Ex. Technically - Bing is technically as good, but Google has more data.
  • Twitter survived many attempts by management to take it down. You have huge inertia.
  • Bing - tried an NLP engine. Tech wasn't there yet.
  • There's a limit to how shitty google can become.
  • Ex. Page Rank - made Google successful. This was a decentralized mechanism.
  • Google will lose dominance at some point. Very vulnerable in ways. 1. They tried machine learning - cornering the market. Didn't succeed. Someone will come out with a 100x better machine learning algorithm.
  • 2 - another mortal threat. Ad-blockers vs Ad-sellers. Ad blockers will get an upper hand at one point, collapsing the system.