The Trap of Permanent Mediocrity: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "There is a cultural phenomenon of Permanent Mediocrity Fallacy, driven by short term human thinking - which is responsible for many open source projects not getting anywhere....")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There is a cultural phenomenon of Permanent Mediocrity Fallacy, driven by short term human thinking - which is responsible for many open source projects not getting anywhere.  
There is a cultural phenomenon of Permanent Mediocrity Fallacy, driven by short term human thinking - which is responsible for much of open source software remaining mediocre for ever, and not dominating the space as has been demonstrated by products such as Linux, Wordpress, Blender, and others - which have become the respected industry standards with the highest market share in their respective areas.  


In the Fallacy
In the Fallacy, a user has a choice between an open source or a free, proprietary product. This is not considering a paid proprietary product, which already has a gate to it in terms of price.
 
A person will normally choose the 'better' product for their immediate need.

Revision as of 21:56, 24 August 2022

There is a cultural phenomenon of Permanent Mediocrity Fallacy, driven by short term human thinking - which is responsible for much of open source software remaining mediocre for ever, and not dominating the space as has been demonstrated by products such as Linux, Wordpress, Blender, and others - which have become the respected industry standards with the highest market share in their respective areas.

In the Fallacy, a user has a choice between an open source or a free, proprietary product. This is not considering a paid proprietary product, which already has a gate to it in terms of price.

A person will normally choose the 'better' product for their immediate need.